<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Gets Dinged by Brazil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/01/04/youtube-gets-dinged-by-brazil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/01/04/youtube-gets-dinged-by-brazil/</link>
	<description>Business and Legal Notes, mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:12:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Startup Toolbox</title>
		<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/01/04/youtube-gets-dinged-by-brazil/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Startup Toolbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/01/04/youtube-gets-dinged-by-brazil/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Saddam Hussein Execution Filmed by Phone Camera And we thought &#8220;regular&#8221; video cameras let us see things as never before.  I am amazed that someone was able to wave a phone around in the execution chamber without being spotted.  Nevertheless, this episode gives us a glimpse of the possibilities user-generated content allow in the political sphere.  The raucous footage gave the lie to the solemn, sedate image the Iraqi government tried to offer of the execution.  Moreover, the immediate dispersal of the footage shows clearly that once something has been recorded and uploaded somewhere, the cat has not merely been let out of the bag, but instantly cloned and distributed worldwide.  Were it not for the fact that just about everyone&#8217;s response to the execution was &#8220;good riddance&#8221; (by contrast, imagine if it had been Moqtada al-Sadr being mocked as the noose tightened), this could have been a disaster for the Iraqi government. YouTube Blocked by Brazilian ISPs, then Un-blocked Again On note related by technology though decidedly seamier, a Brazilian court ordered YouTube to completely remove videos of a Brazilian model from its site.  YouTube protested that it couldn&#8217;t do so selectively and moreover it couldn&#8217;t prevent users from re-uploading the video.  Since I can&#8217;t read Portuguese I can&#8217;t verify the chain of orders, but it appears that the court order extended both to YouTube itself and to Brazil&#8217;s ISPs.  The ISPs, also unable to selectively block one video (or more accurately, many copies of a single piece of footage), instead blocked all of YouTube for several hours until the order was reversed. The entire episode demonstrates a couple of things.  First, courts are wishing for a simpler time when they could just lock the cat away and be done with it.  Part of the court&#8217;s final order was apparently a request to explain why YouTube and the ISPs were unable to comply with the initial order.  Second, this story ended happily for YouTube, but the next one might not.  Being at the vanguard of the user-generated content revolution is going to leave some scars for sure. Apple and Cisco Outdo One Another in Shows of Chutzpah Apple announces the long-awaited, much-delayed iPhone, only to be promptly sued by Cisco for trademark infringement.  Cisco had just released its own iPhone-branded product in December.  Word is that negotiations stopped without a signed deal Monday night before Tuesday&#8217;s product unveiling and Apple let Cisco know after the announcement that there was no deal after all. From where I sit, it seems like there is plenty of hubris to go around on all sides here.  Sure, Apple&#8217;s move is brazen.  I imagine their view is that the litigation will serve no one and they are going to make so much money off the device that they can afford to let it drag on for a little while until a deal is made. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saddam Hussein Execution Filmed by Phone Camera And we thought &#8220;regular&#8221; video cameras let us see things as never before.  I am amazed that someone was able to wave a phone around in the execution chamber without being spotted.  Nevertheless, this episode gives us a glimpse of the possibilities user-generated content allow in the political sphere.  The raucous footage gave the lie to the solemn, sedate image the Iraqi government tried to offer of the execution.  Moreover, the immediate dispersal of the footage shows clearly that once something has been recorded and uploaded somewhere, the cat has not merely been let out of the bag, but instantly cloned and distributed worldwide.  Were it not for the fact that just about everyone&#8217;s response to the execution was &#8220;good riddance&#8221; (by contrast, imagine if it had been Moqtada al-Sadr being mocked as the noose tightened), this could have been a disaster for the Iraqi government. YouTube Blocked by Brazilian ISPs, then Un-blocked Again On note related by technology though decidedly seamier, a Brazilian court ordered YouTube to completely remove videos of a Brazilian model from its site.  YouTube protested that it couldn&#8217;t do so selectively and moreover it couldn&#8217;t prevent users from re-uploading the video.  Since I can&#8217;t read Portuguese I can&#8217;t verify the chain of orders, but it appears that the court order extended both to YouTube itself and to Brazil&#8217;s ISPs.  The ISPs, also unable to selectively block one video (or more accurately, many copies of a single piece of footage), instead blocked all of YouTube for several hours until the order was reversed. The entire episode demonstrates a couple of things.  First, courts are wishing for a simpler time when they could just lock the cat away and be done with it.  Part of the court&#8217;s final order was apparently a request to explain why YouTube and the ISPs were unable to comply with the initial order.  Second, this story ended happily for YouTube, but the next one might not.  Being at the vanguard of the user-generated content revolution is going to leave some scars for sure. Apple and Cisco Outdo One Another in Shows of Chutzpah Apple announces the long-awaited, much-delayed iPhone, only to be promptly sued by Cisco for trademark infringement.  Cisco had just released its own iPhone-branded product in December.  Word is that negotiations stopped without a signed deal Monday night before Tuesday&#8217;s product unveiling and Apple let Cisco know after the announcement that there was no deal after all. From where I sit, it seems like there is plenty of hubris to go around on all sides here.  Sure, Apple&#8217;s move is brazen.  I imagine their view is that the litigation will serve no one and they are going to make so much money off the device that they can afford to let it drag on for a little while until a deal is made. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
