<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online New York Times vs. Wall Street Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/09/14/online-new-york-times-vs-wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/09/14/online-new-york-times-vs-wall-street-journal/</link>
	<description>Business and Legal Notes, mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:12:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/09/14/online-new-york-times-vs-wall-street-journal/comment-page-1/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jparkhill.com/2007/09/14/online-new-york-times-vs-wall-street-journal/#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>Traffic &amp; subscriber #&#039;s is purely the key.  What they do with the traffic can evolve over time.  NYT.com going completely free will only help their traffic numbers.

The WSJ.com pre-Murdoch is still pursuing paid subscriptions, but if you notice, they&#039;re really now adpoting HEAVY promotional discounting as a strategy.

i.e. &lt;a href=&quot;http://1.wallstreetjournaI.googlepages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://1.wallstreetjournaI.googlepages.com&lt;/a&gt; shows how this works in action.  You have the online wsj.com subscription used to be at $99/year alone.  Now, they&#039;re selling it PLUS the print version with free delivery for $125 combined PLUS throwing in 2 months.  That&#039;s outrageous pricing, and consumers should notice and sign-up --&gt; which will lead to higher renewal subscriptions later down the line and higher traffic.  Very interesting and good marketing technique in my opinion.  Back to the old lifetime value model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic &amp; subscriber #&#8217;s is purely the key.  What they do with the traffic can evolve over time.  NYT.com going completely free will only help their traffic numbers.</p>
<p>The WSJ.com pre-Murdoch is still pursuing paid subscriptions, but if you notice, they&#8217;re really now adpoting HEAVY promotional discounting as a strategy.</p>
<p>i.e. <a href="http://1.wallstreetjournaI.googlepages.com" rel="nofollow">http://1.wallstreetjournaI.googlepages.com</a> shows how this works in action.  You have the online wsj.com subscription used to be at $99/year alone.  Now, they&#8217;re selling it PLUS the print version with free delivery for $125 combined PLUS throwing in 2 months.  That&#8217;s outrageous pricing, and consumers should notice and sign-up &#8211;&gt; which will lead to higher renewal subscriptions later down the line and higher traffic.  Very interesting and good marketing technique in my opinion.  Back to the old lifetime value model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

