<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal Combustion &#8220;Not a Great Product&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/01/14/internal-combustion-not-a-great-product/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/01/14/internal-combustion-not-a-great-product/</link>
	<description>Business and Legal Notes, mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:12:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: christina</title>
		<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/01/14/internal-combustion-not-a-great-product/comment-page-1/#comment-4618</link>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/01/14/internal-combustion-not-a-great-product/#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing to this, Jay. He voices a lot of the questions I&#039;ve been thinking about when it comes to the VC model for clean tech. I think a lot of these bigger infrastructure plays are going to require a combination of funding mechanisms marrying folks who never would have played together before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing to this, Jay. He voices a lot of the questions I&#8217;ve been thinking about when it comes to the VC model for clean tech. I think a lot of these bigger infrastructure plays are going to require a combination of funding mechanisms marrying folks who never would have played together before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

