<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Directors&#8217; Duties to Shareholders and Society at Large</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/06/12/directors-duties-to-shareholders-and-society-at-large/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/06/12/directors-duties-to-shareholders-and-society-at-large/</link>
	<description>Business and Legal Notes, mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:48:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: twilightshirts</title>
		<link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/06/12/directors-duties-to-shareholders-and-society-at-large/comment-page-1/#comment-5657</link>
		<dc:creator>twilightshirts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jparkhill.com/?p=270#comment-5657</guid>
		<description>From the social welfare side, this bill would say clearly that directors need not hew to the Friedman viewpoint and may take a broad view of corporate duties. On the other hand, the list of factors a director may consider is long and not well-defined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the social welfare side, this bill would say clearly that directors need not hew to the Friedman viewpoint and may take a broad view of corporate duties. On the other hand, the list of factors a director may consider is long and not well-defined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
